The Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) government on Tuesday appointed the AJK
High Court Chief Justice Ghulam Mustafa Mughal as acting Chief Election
Commissioner (CEC) in a move that an opposition lawmaker said amounted to
infringement of the Interim Constitution Act 1974.
“In exercise of powers conferred by section 6-A of the AJK Chief
Election Commissioner (Terms and Conditions) Act, 1992, as amended vide
Ordinance XIX of 2015, the AJK President, after consultation with the AJK
(Supreme Court) Chief Justice, has been pleased to appoint Mr Justice Ghulam
Mustafa Mughal, Chief Justice AJK High Court, as acting CEC in addition to his
duties as High Court CJ, till the appointment of (permanent) CEC,” said a
notification issued by the AJK law department here.
“The notification shall take effect on and from the date Justice Mughal
takes upon himself the oath of this office,” it added.
An official spokesman told this scribe that Justice Mughal would be administered oath at 11:30 am on Wednesday.
Under section 50 of the AJK Interim Constitution Act, 1974, the CEC is appointed
by the AJK President on the advice of the Council (headed by the Prime Minister
of Pakistan as Chairman) on such terms and conditions, as may be prescribed (by
law or rules made thereunder).
However, the issue had become an area of contention between the
governments in Muzaffarabad and Islamabad, after the retirement of Justice
Munir Ahmed Chaudhry on April 14, 2015, who was holding the additional charge
of this office since April 27, 2013.
On September 11, the Council sent an advice to the AJK government for
the appointment of Justice (retired) Munir as CEC for one year and 15 days,
i.e. the remaining period of his previous term of three years.
However, the AJK government did not comply with the advice, and instead
filed a reference in the AJK Supreme Court that which authority was competent
to legislate about the terms and conditions of CEC in the present situation.
Interestingly, the AJK Chief Election Commissioner (Terms &
Conditions) Act was passed by the AJK Assembly in 1992 and by the Council in
2000.
The Apex Court opined on October 21 that the matter relating to the
terms and conditions of the CEC was within the legislative competence of the
AJK Assembly and not the AJK Council.
After the apex court opinion the AJK government promulgated Ordinance
XIX of 2015, whereby section 6-A was inserted in the 1992 Act to create room
for the appointment of acting CEC.
However, in the meanwhile, the Council sent advice for appointment of
Justice Mughal as permanent CEC. Instead of following the advice, the AJK
government locked horns with the Council, maintaining that Justice Mughal did
not figure in the 3-member panel it had sent to the Council for the purpose.
In the meanwhile, the AJK government asked the AJK Supreme Court CJ to recommend
any judge as acting CEC. As the SC CJ also proposed Justice Mughal, the
government initiated the case for his appointment as acting CEC. The summary
was however withheld by the chief secretary on the grounds that since the
constitutional advice from the Council for appointment of permanent CEC had
already been received, there was no reason to appoint an acting CEC.
On Monday, the AJK President allegedly wrote to the chief secretary to
return the summary, lying pending with him. While that was yet to happen, the
government initiated a fresh case for appointment of acting CEC and got the notification
issued from the law department on Tuesday, without involving the chief
secretary’s office.
Under section 7 (b) of the Rules of Business, all cases submitted to
the Prime Minister are required to be routed back through the chief secretary.
However, sources confirmed that the summary regarding Mr Mughal’s appointment was not routed back through
the chief secretary’s office.
Chaudhry Tariq Farooq, deputy opposition leader in the AJK Assembly and
PML-N senior vice president, said the government had infringed the interim
Constitution Act, 1974 by ignoring the advice of the Council.
“Unfortunately the AJK government is on a warpath under a well thought
out conspiracy and in doing so is trespassing not only the subordinate laws but
also the supreme law, that is the Constitution,” he said.
... Tariq Naqash
No comments:
Post a Comment