A man who claimed he served in an intelligence agency was beaten black and blue by the University of Azad Jammu
and Kashmir (UAJK) students here on Thursday, allegedly for blackmailing a
female student in connivance with a non-local academician.
Afterwards, the students brought the injured official
to the office of Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Muzaffarabad Irfan
Masood Kashfi, with his mobile phone and that of the victim as an evidence of
their allegations.
Both the phones were handed over to the SSP “so that
he could see for himself the obnoxious texts sent by the accused to the
victim.”
The accused, when confronted by some media persons in
one of the chambers of SSP’s office, claimed that he would visit the University
for “verification of students for the scholarships.”
However, he could not offer a plausible reply when
asked that in which capacity he was carrying out such a task.
Later, student leaders Zubair Ahmed Mir, Farooq Mir,
Raja Asad Farooq, Mehtab Abbasi, Asim Kamran and Mahmood Ahmed Mir held a press
conference on the issue and called for exemplary punishment to all those
involved in the heinous act of blackmailing female students for carnal desires.
They alleged that the accused official in connivance
with Mr Abdul Majeed Niazi, Director, Institute of Education, UAJK, started
texting her from September 26 initially to facilitate her scholarship, while
introducing himself as Captain Sheraz from an intelligence agency.
On Thursday morning, he arrived at the entrance of the
UAJK’s City Campus and kept on pressing the girl through text messages to come
out for a date with him, they said.
As the victim had already shared her plight with a
class representative (CR), dozens of infuriated students got hold of the
accused on the main road outside the city campus and started beating him like
anything, they added.
According to them, when the mobile of the accused was
snatched, he claimed that it belonged to Mr Niazi, a resident of Mianwali
appointed in the UAJK under Tenure Track System more than two years ago.
The student leaders further claimed that when they
were bringing the accused to the SSP office, he begged them to let him go and
in return he would share details about the network that blackmailed the female
students.
Initially apprehensive of police, the student leaders however
praised them at the press conference for their “positive attitude and
cooperation.”
In the afternoon, the victim also recorded her
statement before Deputy Commissioner Masoodur Rehman, wherein she reportedly
said that she was being blackmailed by the agency official and the UAJK director.
When
contacted, SSP Kashfi told this scribe late in the evening that since the accused
claimed himself to be an employee of an intelligence agency, he had been handed
over to them for trial by a military court.
“We have
recorded evidence and statements of all concerned and the same has also been
provided to the concerned military authorities for further action under the
law,” he said.
He said due
to the alleged involvement of a UAJK director in this case, the police had also
taken Vice Chancellor Dr Syed Dilnawaz Ahmed Gardezi on board, and the latter had
committed to hold an internal inquiry by October 20.
Earlier
in the day, a UAJK spokesman said that the Vice Chancellor had taken serious
notice of the brawl between the students and an “outsider” outside the city
campus and formed a committee to hold impartial and independent investigations
and submit its report at the earliest.
The committee is headed by dean faculty of science and
engineering Prof Dr Mohammad Rustam Khan and includes dean faculty of arts Prof
Dr Nadeem Haider Bukhari, director students’ affairs Prof Amir Farooq and his
predecessor Prof Ikram ur Rasheed and coordinator BS (education) programme Prof
Siddique Awan.
“The Vice Chancellor has made it clear that no one can
be allowed to vitiate the academic environment of the sacred institution and
that stern action will be taken in case any varsity official was found guilty,”
the spokesman said.
Tariq Naqash
very sad sir, University investigations needs to be followed.
ReplyDeleteA Doctor should not examin a female without a chaperone . Every now and again complaint may come forward if a black sheep or a rotten egg does something very silly and stupid.. If proven individual should have severe punishment . His licence to practice should be withdrawn.
ReplyDelete