Friday, July 26, 2013

Nawaz Sharif's decision on no trust move leaves his party wretched in AJK



No doubt, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s decision to keep the Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) chapter of his Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) away from the no confidence move against AJK Prime Minister Chaudhry Abdul Majeed has given new lease of life to the latter, but many believe it has wreaked havoc on his own party in the region.
Mr Sharif’s decision came like a bolt from the blue for the PML-N AJK leaders, who had thrown their weight behind the no trust resolution to “rid the people of AJK of a corrupt, inefficient and unscrupulous regime” after a lengthy meeting in Islamabad on Tuesday (July 24).
At the same meeting, a charge sheet against Mr Majeed, citing alleged corruption of his government in mega deals, was also handed over to Mr Haider, on the basis of which it was finally decided that the party must lend support to the no trust resolution.
If one is to believe an Islamabad based anchor of Kashmiri origin, Mr Sharif invited him for a briefing on the “merits and demerits” of (supporting) the no trust move, following which he took decision that his party would remain “impartial.” 
 The anchor, who declined to be quoted, claimed before this scribe that Mr Sharif had no prior formal intimation of the political manoeuvres of his party’s AJK chapter and that he (PM) had come to know about its support to the no trust move from the TV tickers and newspaper clippings.
Mr Sharif is deadly against the culture of lota cracy – a term for turncoats in Pakistan – and that’s why he decided to keep his party away from the move, stressed the anchor.
What added insult to the injury was the fact the Mr Sharif did not give audience to PML-N AJK president Raja Farooq Haider to hear from the horse’s mouth reasons and justification for the supporting the move.
Instead, during his meeting with the anchor, he spoke to Mr Majeed for about 10 minutes on phone, but did not bother to contact Haider, his handpicked representative in AJK. 
Background interviews with PML-N leaders and other sources revealed that it was not that Mr Sharif was completely blank about the no trust move as at least two of his confidants - minister for information Pervaiz Rasheed and minister for Kashmir affairs Barjees Tahir - were not only aware of what the party’s AJK chapter was up to but had also expressed their support.
According to one PML-N sources, the information minister had uttered a famous Persian verse, Hama’n Yara’n Dozakh, Hama’n Yara’n Bahisht (Together with friends in Hell or Heaven) before Mr Haider and PML-N AJK secretary general Shah Ghulam Qadir when the duo met him and told that they (PML-N AJK) had decided, “at the end of its tether, to support efforts to dislodge Mr Majeed’s corrupt government.”
On July 25, two days after the submission of no trust resolution, Barjees Tahir told the official APP news agency that PML-N AJK would support the no confidence move against Mr Majeed.  
Sources claimed that Mr Haider had been seeking an appointment from Mr Sharif for the past six weeks to seek guidance about the party’s strategy in AJK “where winds of change had started blowing.” At a chance meeting in Lahore, Mr Haider was compelled to send a chit to Mr Sharif scribbled with a request for a meeting but to no avail.
Recently, Mr Sharif made two tours to AJK to inspect and inaugurate hydropower projects, but could not spare time for a sitting with his party leaders here. Rather they felt he was offering them cold shoulders, sources added.
Soon after the TV channels started airing breaking news that Mr Sharif had decided to remain impartial in AJK, Mr Haider once again sought a meeting with Mr Sharif. He waited in Islamabad over the next 24 hours, but there was no call.
Finally, he invited his entire parliamentary party to meet in Islamabad, and the meeting lasted till 2 am on Friday during which the participants discussed, and of course vented anger at, what had been done by their leadership at the last moment.
The message that the PML-N will remain impartial in AJK was repeated at the federal cabinet meeting earlier in the day. And to ensure that the PML-N AJK leaders should not take any otherwise decision at the meeting, they were again reminded of it in a “strong worded” message shortly before the commencement of their meeting.
“Prime Minister (Sharif) has taken a decision and if anybody does not fall in line, he will have to face the music,” Mr Rasheed told Mr Haider by phone, without mincing words.
The meeting heard charged speeches, and Mr Haider, who otherwise carries the reputation of a straightforward, rather blunt, leader, kept on listening in a virtual state of helplessness. Finally, the majority’s opinion prevailed that the party must live with this situation or else they could “earn ire of Mian sahib.”
It would not be out of place to recall that when PML-N was being launched in AJK, its leaders here had claimed that they would not act as “puppets” like that of the PPAJK leaders and instead would enjoy independence in their internal decisions.
However, the fate of their first ‘independent’ decision had made a mockery of their claims.
“People will rightfully ask us that will we submit ourselves in the same manner if tomorrow a decision on Kashmir issue is imposed on us in the same fashion,” one chagrined leader said.
Party leaders also wonder as to what stance will they take before the public about their oft-trumpeted allegations, which had also surfaced in the charge sheet.
Feeling wretched, many PML-N leaders and workers feel they would hardly be able to play the role of a vigorous and effective opposition in AJK against a government protected by none other than their own leader (Mr Sharif).
And many party workers have already started posing hard-hitting comments and questions on social media.
The PML-N cadres are of the view that while their central leadership kept on maintaining that they would remain impartial in AJK, practically it had interfered in AJK to rescue Mr Majeed’s government.
They believe that they have been sacrificed at the altar of their party’s interests in Pakistan, and for the second time.
Previously, at the time of election of special seats of AJK Assembly, the PML-N leadership took its AJK chapter by surprise by fielding Dr Fauzia Ashraf for one reserved seat it was able to grab.  The lady had not even visited AJK before that election, but she was gifted the membership because her spouse, Dr Tahir Javed of PML-Q, had formed a so-called “Unification Bloc” in the Punjab Assembly and his support was required to sustain the government of Shahbaz Sharif. Of course it was not lota cracy by any means. 
This time round it was perhaps the presidential election, as the PML-N leadership wanted not to annoy the PPP lest it might not leave the fray. However, that goal remained unachieved after the PPP announced its boycott of the presidential polls.
 And when earlier in the day a PML-N delegation visited nine zero in Karachi to seek support of the MQM for its presidential candidate Mamnoon Hussain, many people were reminded of Mr Sharif’s earlier statements against the urban Sindh based party, which he had held responsible for all acts of terrorism in Karachi.
Of course that too had nothing to do with the lota cracy or morality as was questioned by many on the social media, instantly.
All said and done, the PML N leaders in AJK, who were eyeing next government in AJK, are worried as to how they will do the damage control and make ordinary voters believe that they do enjoy assertiveness, independence, credibility and status before their central leadership that will eventually help them safeguard the interests of this region.
“I don’t think any political force in AJK will trust us in future. Instead, they may prefer to talk to the anchorpersons whose views are more valuable for our leader (Mr Sharif) than our observations and sentiments,” summed up one of the PML-N leaders here.
Ends

No comments:

Post a Comment